Register | Login | Set as Home Page | Bookmark | General Enquiries | Help | Saturday, 26th of May 2012
Health & Safety Matters
 hsmsearch.com
Search 
Magazine 
Register for our ENewsletter
Click to visit http://www.toyota-forklifts.co.uk/EN/resources/Pages/default.aspx
What next?
 Request further Information    visit web site     Send to friend
 BSIF Enterprise company's profile
Click to visit http://www.uvex-safety.co.uk/

Poll : May
Will you be getting involved in EU-OSHA's Healthy Workplaces campaign?
This is an anonymous poll for statistical purposes only
Last Month's Poll

In the wake of the "Jerry Can" advice controversy, should Francis Maude have quit?

Yes : 56%

No : 44%

Follow Health & Safety Matters on Twitter

A solution to the Harmonised Standards problem?
June 1st 2008

For some time now the BSIF has been concerned about the trend towards adding "negative" elements into Annex ZA within harmonised PPE EN standards. While this appears to be a technical issue, the consequences would likely have adversely affected every manufacturer, notified body and user of personal protective equipment. The BSIF is pleased to report that its persistence and cogent arguments have been heard and the problem appears to have been solved.

PPE Directive to be reviewed

While the PPE Directive (PPED) works reasonably well, it could benefit from some tidying-up to correct a number of translational variances. It will be reviewed in time once the ‘blueprint’ for New Approach Directives, of which the PPED is one, is finalised.

This ‘blueprint’ originally contained the facility for any standard to be harmonised and, at the same time, list in this Annex ZA areas where the basic health and safety requirements had not been met. Also, products could comply with a harmonised standard and gain a presumption of conformity with the Directive - a situation which would create a ‘halfpregnant’ situation leading to many disputes between manufacturers and notified bodies on how to satisfy the requirement of the PPED. This would then likely create much confusion with users seeking to access suitable protection.

European issue

The New Approach ‘blueprint’ now clearly states that for a harmonised standard to provide a presumption of conformity it needs to have been published in the EU's Official Journal. This means that the EU Commission is now taking responsibility for the judgement as to whether specific health and safety requirements are (or are not) essential and ensures that everyone can now be comfortable that any item of PPE is correctly described by the standard it claims to meet.

While the UK government department (BERR) has been supportive of the BSIF's position, the fact that there are now twenty-seven member states and qualified majority voting operates in this area created the real possibility that this matter would not be resolved through diplomatic channels. Despite the inertia of the ESF and the lack of interest within the Horizontal Group, the BSIF has successfully lobbied the EU Commission with the assistance of BERR to bring about these changes. The BSIF now hopes that the previously anticipated confusion will be prevented.

More articles from BSIF Enterprise:

The BSIF comments on the Lofstedt Review (19th December 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

Winners of the BSIF Safety Awards 2011 (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

The BSIF and REMA join forces to help combat illegal PPE (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

BSIF gains prime time viewing (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

Clean Air? Take Care! launched (25th May 2010)

From Newsletter Stories

Campaign Update - Fit2Fit and Registered Safety Supplier Scheme (12th February 2010)

From Newsletter Stories

From the Secretary’s desk (1st February 2009)

From BSIF News

Exporting British products and services (22nd January 2008)

From Newsletter Stories

UNDERSTANDING 'STANDARD' (1st December 2007)

From BSIF News

BSIF News in Brief (1st December 2003)

Who wants the Keymark?

From News