Register | Login | Set as Home Page | Bookmark | General Enquiries | Help | Saturday, 26th of May 2012
Health & Safety Matters
 hsmsearch.com
Search 
Magazine 
Register for our ENewsletter
Click to visit http://www.toyota-forklifts.co.uk/EN/resources/Pages/default.aspx
What next?
 Request further Information    visit web site     Send to friend
 BSIF Enterprise company's profile
Click to visit http://www.uvex-safety.co.uk/

Poll : May
Will you be getting involved in EU-OSHA's Healthy Workplaces campaign?
This is an anonymous poll for statistical purposes only
Last Month's Poll

In the wake of the "Jerry Can" advice controversy, should Francis Maude have quit?

Yes : 56%

No : 44%

Follow Health & Safety Matters on Twitter

Competence matters
June 1st 2007

The BSIF believes it is now important that clients of safety professionals and employers of safety specialists should have a more simple and accurate process to evaluate the people they are to engage to provide them with safety advice.

As in all professions, there are excellent practitioners and some who lack the necessary skills and experience. With marketing, legal and financial advice, the company might suffer but when it comes to health and safety the consequences of poor judgments can be much more serious.

It has always been the case that anyone engaging professional services has needed to use much care and research to ensure that they are likely to get good advice and value. Whether it is marketing, legal, accounting or safety advice that is being sought, there is little in the way of independent, transparently visible competence information available to the prospective client.

In general, the better provider of professional information will provide a CV outlining their track record, but many recruitment decisions are based on a mix of recommendations from friends, membership of a professional institution and/or the interpersonal chemistry established through interview – all without one vital piece of information – can this person do the job? There have been some moves towards establishing a competence standard and, because definition is not easy, these have usually been generated as applicable to specific functional operations. Unfortunately, the majority of health and safety professionals do not operate continuously in a fixed environment and it would assist enormously if a generic competence standard could be available for safety professionals, albeit that specific environmental experience might also be highly relevant.

Such a standard will help everybody – the safety professional evidencing compliance would immediately be in a better position to sell his/her skills and the client would have a meaningful basis on which to judge the prospective recruit’s ability to perform. The BSIF will continue its objective towards a UK recognised competence standard for Safety Professionals and is actively engaged with other stakeholders to ensure that when it is available, it is acceptable on a national basis in much the same way as the legal and financial professions operate. It would be counterproductive if the possibility of vested interests in respect of membership incomes were permitted to corrupt the ways in which safety professional competence is evaluated.

More articles from BSIF Enterprise:

The BSIF comments on the Lofstedt Review (19th December 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

Winners of the BSIF Safety Awards 2011 (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

The BSIF and REMA join forces to help combat illegal PPE (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

BSIF gains prime time viewing (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

Clean Air? Take Care! launched (25th May 2010)

From Newsletter Stories

Campaign Update - Fit2Fit and Registered Safety Supplier Scheme (12th February 2010)

From Newsletter Stories

From the Secretary’s desk (1st February 2009)

From BSIF News

Exporting British products and services (22nd January 2008)

From Newsletter Stories

UNDERSTANDING 'STANDARD' (1st December 2007)

From BSIF News

BSIF News in Brief (1st December 2003)

Who wants the Keymark?

From News