Register | Login | Set as Home Page | Bookmark | General Enquiries | Help | Saturday, 26th of May 2012
Health & Safety Matters
 hsmsearch.com
Search 
Magazine 
Register for our ENewsletter
Click to visit http://www.toyota-forklifts.co.uk/EN/resources/Pages/default.aspx
What next?
 Request further Information    visit web site     Send to friend
 BSIF Enterprise company's profile
Click to visit http://www.uvex-safety.co.uk/

Poll : May
Will you be getting involved in EU-OSHA's Healthy Workplaces campaign?
This is an anonymous poll for statistical purposes only
Last Month's Poll

In the wake of the "Jerry Can" advice controversy, should Francis Maude have quit?

Yes : 56%

No : 44%

Follow Health & Safety Matters on Twitter

LOBBYING FOR CHANGE
June 1st 2007

Hosted by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Occupational Safety, which the Federation sponsors, the BSIF mounted a reception at the House of Commons to lobby for parliamentary support for several issues which, it believes, need national solutions. Michael Clapham, Chair of the APG, welcomed MPs and guests and invited Geoff Hooke of the BSIF to make a brief address.

Geoff noted the inclusive nature of the APG and the relationship it now has with its joint sponsor, the TUC, and the fact that the BSIF has always enjoyed a good working relationship with government departments. He emphasised that it is important for organisations to talk to MPs to ensure that a balanced approach is maintained and that no specific political implications can be drawn from the positions it has in respect of health and safety. Geoff commented that mischievous reportage in some of the media was increasing costs to society, resulting in increased insurance premiums when there is no increase in the risks. "We have been staggered to learn that up to 40% of business insurance premiums are the result of compensation expectations and that up to 27% of local rates are budgeted for the same purpose. Clearly, we are all paying a heavy price for unco-ordinated good intentions," he said.

The BSIF regrets the fact that VAT on PPE penalises those who can least afford it and that anyone who is not registered for VAT pays a 17.5% penalty when they purchase PPE. Most PPE is purchased commercially as an ‘overhead’ and not as a raw material. The VAT is, therefore, usually subject to full reclaim, without added value and with no net gain to the treasury. "It seems immoral that the general public, the self-employed and the unregistered worker should pay a 17.5% premium for protection when companies pay less." The BSIF believes that a national campaign should be mounted to improve awareness of PPE and the way in which it is selected. In closing, Geoff said "In mounting this reception, the BSIF hopes it can start a process that will lead to a more informed approach to occupational safety and health.”

• For a copy of the BSIF address or to support its activities, contact the BSIF – through the editor please.

More articles from BSIF Enterprise:

The BSIF comments on the Lofstedt Review (19th December 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

Winners of the BSIF Safety Awards 2011 (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

The BSIF and REMA join forces to help combat illegal PPE (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

BSIF gains prime time viewing (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

Clean Air? Take Care! launched (25th May 2010)

From Newsletter Stories

Campaign Update - Fit2Fit and Registered Safety Supplier Scheme (12th February 2010)

From Newsletter Stories

From the Secretary’s desk (1st February 2009)

From BSIF News

Exporting British products and services (22nd January 2008)

From Newsletter Stories

UNDERSTANDING 'STANDARD' (1st December 2007)

From BSIF News

BSIF News in Brief (1st December 2003)

Who wants the Keymark?

From News