Register | Login | Set as Home Page | Bookmark | General Enquiries | Help | Saturday, 26th of May 2012
Health & Safety Matters
 hsmsearch.com
Search 
Magazine 
Register for our ENewsletter
Click to visit http://www.toyota-forklifts.co.uk/EN/resources/Pages/default.aspx
What next?
 Request further Information    visit web site     Send to friend
 BSIF Enterprise company's profile
Click to visit http://www.uvex-safety.co.uk/

Poll : May
Will you be getting involved in EU-OSHA's Healthy Workplaces campaign?
This is an anonymous poll for statistical purposes only
Last Month's Poll

In the wake of the "Jerry Can" advice controversy, should Francis Maude have quit?

Yes : 56%

No : 44%

Follow Health & Safety Matters on Twitter

Safety passports: ‘Not all they seem’
June 1st 2007

The BSIF believes that because Site Safety Passports are based on a ‘qualification’ rather than an ‘accreditation’ principle there is often a serious lack of competence which contributes to incidents and injuries.

A point in time assessment against indistinct pass/fail criteria is no substitute for a regular assessment of a person's ability to apply the necessary skills. "In fact it is worse than this since it is now ‘politically incorrect’ to include pass/fail criteria or assessment principles within ‘qualification’ standards, eg NVQ standards. We have been advised this by several awarding bodies," says a BSIF Spokesman.

The BSIF has been working with other organisations, initially to assist the generation of a generic competence standard for safety professionals. The reason for this approach is to be able use this standard to verify that an individual is ‘competent’ to perform. If this is used within a ‘CORGI’ type system which inspects the ability of a safety professional to do the job, not just satisfy an examiner on the day that their knowledge and understanding is adequate, a major hurdle will be overcome.

Unfortunately, there are other issues which need to be resolved before we can have a transparent system of verification that safety professionals and other workers can justify holding a safety-passport. When these passports are granted by those who deliver the training and the CPD relevance is administered by an organisation which benefits from membership fees, it is apparent that the whole system is riddled with adverse vested-interests. These pressures contribute to a mistaken belief that occupational safety is being properly addressed. From this perspective, the creation of a ‘CORGI’ type scheme for safety professionals, regulated by an organisation such as UKAS, would be far more effective, current and transparent.

Unfortunately, such a mechanism is not available through the ‘qualification’ structure because it is not set up to deliver such a scheme.

More articles from BSIF Enterprise:

The BSIF comments on the Lofstedt Review (19th December 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

Winners of the BSIF Safety Awards 2011 (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

The BSIF and REMA join forces to help combat illegal PPE (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

BSIF gains prime time viewing (1st September 2011)

From Newsletter Stories

Clean Air? Take Care! launched (25th May 2010)

From Newsletter Stories

Campaign Update - Fit2Fit and Registered Safety Supplier Scheme (12th February 2010)

From Newsletter Stories

From the Secretary’s desk (1st February 2009)

From BSIF News

Exporting British products and services (22nd January 2008)

From Newsletter Stories

UNDERSTANDING 'STANDARD' (1st December 2007)

From BSIF News

BSIF News in Brief (1st December 2003)

Who wants the Keymark?

From News