Register | Login | Set as Home Page | Bookmark | General Enquiries | Help | Saturday, 04th of February 2012
Health & Safety Matters
 hsmsearch.com
Search 
Magazine 
Register for our ENewsletter
Click to visit http://www.toyota-forklifts.co.uk/EN/resources/Pages/default.aspx
What next?
 Request further Information    visit web site     Send to friend
 QTS company's profile
Click to visit http://www.casellameasurement.com

Poll : February
Spend on health & safety in your organisation in 2012 will be?
This is an anonymous poll for statistical purposes only
Last Month's Poll

Are you in favour or proposals to reduce the number of workplace safety inspections?

Yes - 25%

No - 75%

Follow Health & Safety Matters on Twitter

Revised Act spells increased penalties for law breakers
December 1st 2008

Directors and senior managers could be jailed if they don't look after their own safety or make sure that others aren't put at risk. A new Act passed on 16 October 2008 means that anyone who is convicted of a safety offence can now be imprisoned and not just fined. Higher fines are also now possible for failure to meet safety regulations explains Chris Green

The Health and Safety (Offences) Act 2008, comes into force on 16 January 2009 and only applies to offences committed after this date.

Most offences e.g. those committed by individuals who employ anybody under sections 2 to 6 of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (HSWA) or health and safety regulations, will now be imprisonable. This applies both in the Magistrates' and Crown Court. There will be a maximum of 12 months imprisonment or a fine not exceeding £20,000 in the Magistrates' Court (this power is currently limited to 6 months for cases heard in the Magistrates' Court) or a maximum of 2 years imprisonment or an unlimited fine for the more serious cases which end up in the Crown Court.

The Act will also increase the financial penalty for regulatory offences from £5,000 to £20,000 in the Magistrates' Court. Alternatively, there will be the option for Magistrates' to impose 12 months imprisonment even for breaches of specific Regulations, or two years in the Crown Court.

This means that an employer who runs their business in a way which does not look after the health and safety of their employees or non employees, so far as is reasonably practicable, will potentially face a prison sentence for committing a health and safety offence. As liability can so easily fall on employers particularly for strict requirements under safety Regulations, many small businesses might look to ensure that a company or limited liability partnership employs anyone rather than the owner of the business personally. Readers will note that the burden of proving that what they have done is reasonable and that they are innocent falls on them and the usual presumption of innocence is reversed in this situation.

Even so, the new penalties will also cover individual employees who commit an offence under s.7 HSWA simply by failing to take reasonable care of fellow employees e.g.

an employee who fails to follow his training and causes an injury to a fellow employee or those engaged in horseplay.

Directors and other senior managers do not escape the new provisions. They too can face action under s.37 HSWA and possible imprisonment if they close their eyes to or know about the commission of an offence by a company or if the offence is attributable to their neglect.

The Act brings in major changes to the penalties for health and safety offences. Previously a custodial sentence was only available for a very small number of offences. Generally, a custodial sentence for health and safety failings was only available following a death in the workplace and if the person charged had been grossly negligent, neither of which is a requirement now. Liability may fall on an individual employer arising from the act of one of his employees without him knowing anything about it. The reader may question whether alongside the risks to the company of liability for corporate manslaughter, potential fines of ten per cent of turnover and director disqualification, any board member can afford not to know and take advice about these increased risks. Many Magistrates do not deal daily with safety cases and will have greater financial powers yet no guidance as to the appropriate sentence to impose.

More articles from QTS: