Register | Login | Set as Home Page | Bookmark | General Enquiries | Help | Saturday, 04th of February 2012
Health & Safety Matters
 hsmsearch.com
Search 
Magazine 
Register for our ENewsletter
Click to visit http://www.toyota-forklifts.co.uk/EN/resources/Pages/default.aspx
Click to visit http://www.casellameasurement.com

Poll : February
Spend on health & safety in your organisation in 2012 will be?
This is an anonymous poll for statistical purposes only
Last Month's Poll

Are you in favour or proposals to reduce the number of workplace safety inspections?

Yes - 25%

No - 75%

Follow Health & Safety Matters on Twitter

Eyecare regulations – cut confusion, cut costs
October 1st 2009

Jim Lythgow discusses the two main types of regulation governing eyecare in the workplace: the stringent rules regarding the use of visual display units (VDUs); and the minimal but soon to be updated rules surrounding the eyesight of those who drive in the course of their work

The Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations have been in force since 1992.

While they were set in place to safeguard the eye health of all employees using VDUs, they are very involved and in some places rather ambiguous. Specsavers Corporate Eyecare surveyed* 255 employers, representing over 210,000 employees, regarding interpretations of the DSE regulations. The results showed that although 88% of employers state they are familiar with the regulations, only 70% think they are clear.

The survey went on to show further confusion. The regulations state that the employer must pay the cost of both the eye examination and the full cost of basic spectacles, if they are required for VDU use. Well over three quarters (83%) of respondents misunderstood this: 59% of respondents believe the company should make a contribution to glasses required for VDU use, 20% believe the company may make a contribution if they so wish and 4% believe the employee should fund the total cost.

While misinterpretations like this could put the company in a difficult situation, there were many more misunderstandings that could directly cost a company unnecessary money. The regulations stipulate that the company is allowed to nominate a chosen optician. Nearly half of all respondents (48%) believe, however, that it is up to the employee to decide which optician they visit. Prices between opticians can vary hugely, so companies could be opening themselves up to huge cost implications. In fact, in previous research*, Specsavers discovered that 84% of respondents believe, perhaps from bitter experience, that the total cost of an eye-test and glasses would be over £50 and some were paying as much as £200. Considering it is actually possible to purchase VDU Vouchers to cover the cost of both the eye examination and the full cost of spectacles, if required, for just £17 – the overspend across a company could be massive.

While much time and effort can be spent apparently cost-cutting by trying to exclude employees from eyecare schemes, a policy of inclusion is often beneficial. Finding an eyecare scheme that enables the company to fully meet its obligations is perfectly compatible with finding an eyecare scheme that offers great value for money.

While the DSE regulations are extremely involved, the rules regarding eyesight for those who drive in the course of their work are currently off the other end of the scale.

The legislation covering eyesight requirements for driving was set in the 1930s. Those who drive in the course of their work only have to comply with the basic vision test of being able to read a number-plate at a distance of 20.5 meters.

This is worrying considering how traffic conditions and vehicles have changed in the last 70-plus years. Thankfully, new legislation was passed in the EU Parliament in 2006 and will be introduced in 2011.

The proposal is that commercial licence holders will have their eyesight tested every 5 years, and holders of private licences will be tested every 10 to 15 years. Each member state will have until 2013 to translate the directive into national law.

Driving safety research* conducted by Specsavers Corporate Eyecare shows that an update in the law is long overdue.

Disturbingly, the majority of employers (53%) say they are worried that some employees may be driving during the course of their work when their eyesight is not good enough to do so.

Misunderstanding the VDU regulations can be costly in monetary terms, but not providing adequate care for a driver's eyesight could prove far more costly to personal safety. The corporate manslaughter act could also leave a company open to an unlimited fine.

The message here is simple: it pays to fully understand eyecare regulations.

Jim Lythgow is director of Strategic Alliances for Specsavers Corporate Eyecare.

*Research undertaken on behalf of Specsavers Corporate Eyecare by emedia Free copies of the Specsavers Corporate Eyecare guide to DSE legislation and the Specsavers Corporate Eyecare guide to Driving legislation are available by emailing corporateeyecare@uk.specsavers.com

More articles from Specsavers Optical Superstores Ltd: