Register | Login | Set as Home Page | Bookmark | General Enquiries | Help | Saturday, 19th of May 2012
Health & Safety Matters
 hsmsearch.com
Search 
Magazine 
Register for our ENewsletter
Click to visit http://www.toyota-forklifts.co.uk/EN/resources/Pages/default.aspx
What next?
 Request further Information     Visit Website     Send to friend
 Safesite Limited company's profile
Click to visit http://www.uvex-safety.co.uk/

Poll : May
Will you be getting involved in EU-OSHA's Healthy Workplaces campaign?
This is an anonymous poll for statistical purposes only
Last Month's Poll

In the wake of the "Jerry Can" advice controversy, should Francis Maude have quit?

Yes : 56%

No : 44%

Follow Health & Safety Matters on Twitter

Ready for an emergency?
September 8th 2008

The end of this year will see the publication of the revised HSG33 Health and Safety in Roofwork which is expected to emphasise the need for rescue planning when it comes to work at height.

Although the Work at Height Regulations 2005 already require planning for emergency procedures, this is an area that is often forgotten about. If you consider though that those accessing a roof might not necessarily be experienced in work at height, for example lightning conductor or air conditioning engineers, then it is clear to see why it is essential to follow guidance such as HSG33 and ensure that rescue is planned for.

Many people assume that in the event of an emergency they can simply call 999, but in reality the emergency services are already stretched and may not be able to respond in time or have the right equipment to complete the rescue. In fact, HSG33 is expected to recommend that the emergency services should not be solely relied upon in the event of an emergency.

The other alternatives are to rely on self rescue or for employees to carry out the rescue. However, if the victim is seriously injured or unconscious self rescue would be impossible and if the rescuer is not properly trained then both he and the victim could be put in further danger. Whatever rescue method chosen it should be proportionate to the risk. For example, a MEWP or ladder might be used to reach the victim, or it could simply be a case of lowering them to safety. This is the preferred option as it overcomes manual handling issues, but whatever method is chosen it is essential that all those who are likely to be involved are fully trained.

Following guidance such as that outlined in HSG33 and ensuring that rescue plans are in place and that all concerned are aware of and fully trained in the rescue procedures, will help companies comply with current legislation and importantly, save a life.

For further information on rescue or to discuss a rescue requirement, please contact Safesite at the details above.

More articles from Safesite Limited: